Abstract
The remote presence robotic system (RPRS) enables an individual to “be in two places at once”. Its application includes various uses in medicine and surgery. However, its usefulness in the field of orthopaedic surgery has not been described. The objective of our pilot study was to determine patient and nursing staff satisfaction with the RPRS in an orthopaedic clinical setting in Ireland. We performed evening and weekend ward rounds to gain feedback and determine patient and nursing staff satisfaction with this innovative system. Questionnaires were handed to all patients and staff nurses involved. Both patients and nursing staff had very positive reactions to the RPRS in an orthopaedic postoperative care setting. Potential uses in orthopaedic surgery include clinical outreach in the setting of trauma, supervision in theatre, or watching theatre cases from outside the hospital, providing both patient and parent reassurance in paediatric orthopaedic cases, and, finally, in the setting of outpatient departments. Integration of the RPRS in an orthopaedic clinical setting has exciting and limitless potential. More so in this era in which it would allow trainees to benefit from teaching and training while also cutting down their in-house time and thus hospitals costs.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Sebajang H, Trudeau P, Dougall A, Hegge S, McKinley C, Anvari M (2005) Telementoring: an important enabling tool for the community surgeon. Surg Innov 12:327–331
Lai F (2009) Robotic Telepresence for medical training and education. Stud Health Technol Inform 142:151–152
Lai F (2008) Robotic telestroke program: transforming stroke care. Endovasc Today Suppl 11:8–11
Lai F (2009) Stroke networks based on robotic telepresence. J Telemed Telecare 15(3):135–136
Agarwal R, Levinson A, Allaf M, Markov D, Nason A, Su L (2007) The roboconsultant: telementoring and remote presence in the operating room during minimally invasive urologic surgeries using a novel mobile robotic interface. Urology 70(5):970–974
Rothenberg S, Yoder S, Kay S, Ponsky T (2009) Initial experience with surgical telementoring in pediatric laparoscopic surgery using remote presence technology. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 19(Suppl 1):S219–S222
Vespa P, Miller C, Hu X, Nenov V, Buxey F, Martin N (2007) Intensive care unit robotic telepresence facilitates rapid physician response to unstable patients and decreased cost in neurointensive care. Surg Neurol 67:331–337
Nenov V, Klopp J (1996) Remote analysis of physiological data from neurosurgical ICU patients. J Am Med Inform Assoc 3:318–327
Dorman T (2001) Telecardiology and the intensive care unit. Crit Care Clin 17:293–301
Celi LA, Hassan E, Marquardt C et al (2001) The eICU: it’s not just telemedicine. Crit Care Med 29(8 Suppl):N183–N189
Aronson SH (1977) The Lancet on the telephone 1876–1975. Med Hist 21:69–87
Marescaux J, Leroy J, Gagner M et al (2001) Transatlantic robot-assisted telesurgery. Nature 413:379–380
Cheah WK, Lee B, Lenzi JE, Goh PM (2000) Telesurgical laparoscopic cholecystectomy between two countries. Surg Endosc 14:1085
Janetschek G, Bartsch G, Kavoussi LR (1998) Transcontinental interactive laparoscopic telesurgery between the United States and Europe. J Urol 160:1413
Lee BR, Png DJ, Liew L et al (2000) Laparoscopic telesurgery between the United States and Singapore. Ann Acad Med Singapore 29:665–668
Bauer J, Lee BR, Stoianovici D et al (2001) Remote percutaneous renal access using a new automated telesurgical robotic system. Telemed J E Health 7:341–346
Larkin M (2001) Transatlantic, robot-assisted telesurgery deemed a success. Lancet 358:1074
Ellison LM, Kavoussi LR et al (2004) Telerounding and patient satisfaction after surgery. J Am Coll Surg 199:523–530
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Daruwalla, Z.J., Collins, D.R. & Moore, D.P. “Orthobot, to your station!” The application of the remote presence robotic system in orthopaedic surgery in Ireland: a pilot study on patient and nursing staff satisfaction. J Robotic Surg 4, 177–182 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-010-0207-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-010-0207-x