Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

“Orthobot, to your station!” The application of the remote presence robotic system in orthopaedic surgery in Ireland: a pilot study on patient and nursing staff satisfaction

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Robotic Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The remote presence robotic system (RPRS) enables an individual to “be in two places at once”. Its application includes various uses in medicine and surgery. However, its usefulness in the field of orthopaedic surgery has not been described. The objective of our pilot study was to determine patient and nursing staff satisfaction with the RPRS in an orthopaedic clinical setting in Ireland. We performed evening and weekend ward rounds to gain feedback and determine patient and nursing staff satisfaction with this innovative system. Questionnaires were handed to all patients and staff nurses involved. Both patients and nursing staff had very positive reactions to the RPRS in an orthopaedic postoperative care setting. Potential uses in orthopaedic surgery include clinical outreach in the setting of trauma, supervision in theatre, or watching theatre cases from outside the hospital, providing both patient and parent reassurance in paediatric orthopaedic cases, and, finally, in the setting of outpatient departments. Integration of the RPRS in an orthopaedic clinical setting has exciting and limitless potential. More so in this era in which it would allow trainees to benefit from teaching and training while also cutting down their in-house time and thus hospitals costs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sebajang H, Trudeau P, Dougall A, Hegge S, McKinley C, Anvari M (2005) Telementoring: an important enabling tool for the community surgeon. Surg Innov 12:327–331

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Lai F (2009) Robotic Telepresence for medical training and education. Stud Health Technol Inform 142:151–152

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Lai F (2008) Robotic telestroke program: transforming stroke care. Endovasc Today Suppl 11:8–11

    Google Scholar 

  4. Lai F (2009) Stroke networks based on robotic telepresence. J Telemed Telecare 15(3):135–136

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Agarwal R, Levinson A, Allaf M, Markov D, Nason A, Su L (2007) The roboconsultant: telementoring and remote presence in the operating room during minimally invasive urologic surgeries using a novel mobile robotic interface. Urology 70(5):970–974

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Rothenberg S, Yoder S, Kay S, Ponsky T (2009) Initial experience with surgical telementoring in pediatric laparoscopic surgery using remote presence technology. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 19(Suppl 1):S219–S222

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Vespa P, Miller C, Hu X, Nenov V, Buxey F, Martin N (2007) Intensive care unit robotic telepresence facilitates rapid physician response to unstable patients and decreased cost in neurointensive care. Surg Neurol 67:331–337

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Nenov V, Klopp J (1996) Remote analysis of physiological data from neurosurgical ICU patients. J Am Med Inform Assoc 3:318–327

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Dorman T (2001) Telecardiology and the intensive care unit. Crit Care Clin 17:293–301

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Celi LA, Hassan E, Marquardt C et al (2001) The eICU: it’s not just telemedicine. Crit Care Med 29(8 Suppl):N183–N189

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Aronson SH (1977) The Lancet on the telephone 1876–1975. Med Hist 21:69–87

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Marescaux J, Leroy J, Gagner M et al (2001) Transatlantic robot-assisted telesurgery. Nature 413:379–380

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Cheah WK, Lee B, Lenzi JE, Goh PM (2000) Telesurgical laparoscopic cholecystectomy between two countries. Surg Endosc 14:1085

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Janetschek G, Bartsch G, Kavoussi LR (1998) Transcontinental interactive laparoscopic telesurgery between the United States and Europe. J Urol 160:1413

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Lee BR, Png DJ, Liew L et al (2000) Laparoscopic telesurgery between the United States and Singapore. Ann Acad Med Singapore 29:665–668

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Bauer J, Lee BR, Stoianovici D et al (2001) Remote percutaneous renal access using a new automated telesurgical robotic system. Telemed J E Health 7:341–346

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Larkin M (2001) Transatlantic, robot-assisted telesurgery deemed a success. Lancet 358:1074

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Ellison LM, Kavoussi LR et al (2004) Telerounding and patient satisfaction after surgery. J Am Coll Surg 199:523–530

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zubin J. Daruwalla.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Daruwalla, Z.J., Collins, D.R. & Moore, D.P. “Orthobot, to your station!” The application of the remote presence robotic system in orthopaedic surgery in Ireland: a pilot study on patient and nursing staff satisfaction. J Robotic Surg 4, 177–182 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-010-0207-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-010-0207-x

Keywords

Navigation