Quality reporting requirement | Total quality rating | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
First author | Year | Interprets the data and gave an answer to the study question* | Describes whether it is a laboratory, simulation or field study* | Provides a description of the outcome measure/evaluation criteria* | Provides description of the PHR functionality under investigation | Describes how participants used the PHR functionality under investigation | |
Boland19 | 2014 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
Gu27 | 2013 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
Heyworth21 | 2014 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 5 |
Kim24 | 2009 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
Kogut18 | 2014 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
Nazi23 | 2013 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 5 |
Pai26 | 2013 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 5 |
Spencer25 | 2011 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 5 |
Turvey20 | 2014 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 5 |
Turvey22 | 2012 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 5 |
Total | 10 | 10 | 10 | 8 | 6 |
↵* denotes three most important criteria in the condensed version of the Statement on Reporting of Evaluation Studies in Health Informatics20