TY - JOUR T1 - Can medical algorithms be fair? Three ethical quandaries and one dilemma JF - BMJ Health & Care Informatics JO - BMJ Health Care Inform DO - 10.1136/bmjhci-2021-100445 VL - 29 IS - 1 SP - e100445 AU - Kristine Bærøe AU - Torbjørn Gundersen AU - Edmund Henden AU - Kjetil Rommetveit Y1 - 2022/04/01 UR - http://informatics.bmj.com/content/29/1/e100445.abstract N2 - Objective To demonstrate what it takes to reconcile the idea of fairness in medical algorithms and machine learning (ML) with the broader discourse of fairness and health equality in health research.Method The methodological approach used in this paper is theoretical and ethical analysis.Result We show that the question of ensuring comprehensive ML fairness is interrelated to three quandaries and one dilemma.Discussion As fairness in ML depends on a nexus of inherent justice and fairness concerns embedded in health research, a comprehensive conceptualisation is called for to make the notion useful.Conclusion This paper demonstrates that more analytical work is needed to conceptualise fairness in ML so it adequately reflects the complexity of justice and fairness concerns within the field of health research.No data are available. ER -