Responses

Download PDFPDF

Can we trust electronic health records? The smoking test for commission errors
Compose Response

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Author Information
First or given name, e.g. 'Peter'.
Your last, or family, name, e.g. 'MacMoody'.
Your email address, e.g. higgs-boson@gmail.com
Your role and/or occupation, e.g. 'Orthopedic Surgeon'.
Your organization or institution (if applicable), e.g. 'Royal Free Hospital'.
Statement of Competing Interests

PLEASE NOTE:

  • A rapid response is a moderated but not peer reviewed online response to a published article in a BMJ journal; it will not receive a DOI and will not be indexed unless it is also republished as a Letter, Correspondence or as other content. Find out more about rapid responses.
  • We intend to post all responses which are approved by the Editor, within 14 days (BMJ Journals) or 24 hours (The BMJ), however timeframes cannot be guaranteed. Responses must comply with our requirements and should contribute substantially to the topic, but it is at our absolute discretion whether we publish a response, and we reserve the right to edit or remove responses before and after publication and also republish some or all in other BMJ publications, including third party local editions in other countries and languages
  • Our requirements are stated in our rapid response terms and conditions and must be read. These include ensuring that: i) you do not include any illustrative content including tables and graphs, ii) you do not include any information that includes specifics about any patients,iii) you do not include any original data, unless it has already been published in a peer reviewed journal and you have included a reference, iv) your response is lawful, not defamatory, original and accurate, v) you declare any competing interests, vi) you understand that your name and other personal details set out in our rapid response terms and conditions will be published with any responses we publish and vii) you understand that once a response is published, we may continue to publish your response and/or edit or remove it in the future.
  • By submitting this rapid response you are agreeing to our terms and conditions for rapid responses and understand that your personal data will be processed in accordance with those terms and our privacy notice.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Vertical Tabs

Other responses

Jump to comment:

  • Published on:
    Quicker to run the test than to correct the errors found

    The Smoking Test was run on our practice, 3 years after the initial assessment was conducted. And some learning can be shared:

    -The test was quick to run, even though original reports were not saved. In consequence, three new reports were created, regarding the type of smoking status considered, and one merging records with the 3 entries, followed by collecting in a spreadsheet the three codes with their last entry date. The software allows to collect specific entries without needing to open the records and to export that data. Using simple formulas in excel (Deducting two dates, to see if the difference of days was negative or positive) it was matter of minutes to find again the number of errors.

    -Trying to correct entries took a lot of time, it was not completed. It was considered not necessarily beneficial, more when about half of the entries assessed were not ours, but from associated organisations. We share data, to improve patient care, but each organisation is responsible for their own quality, for their own entries. One could only request to mark entries in error to them. It means if any organisation, is doing similarly, sharing data entry with others, the reports need to be amended to specify which organisation data is to be entered in the searches. It should fix the location problem encountered.

    -Looking at the data, one had to consider also a change in the report of "Never smoked" to fix the problem of currency. In our sample h...

    Show More
    Conflict of Interest:
    None declared.