You are here

  • Home
  • Archive
  • Volume 23, Issue 1
  • A lack of a comparator group makes it hard to be sure whether computerised medical record system implementation achieved a better or worse outcome

Article info

Article menu

Download PDFPDF

XML
Commentary
A lack of a comparator group makes it hard to be sure whether computerised medical record system implementation achieved a better or worse outcome

Authors

  1. Author address for correspondence: Simon de Lusignan, Department of Health Care Management and Policy, University of Surrey, Guildford GU2 7XH, UK s.lusignan{at}surrey.ac.uk

Citation

de Lusignan S, Williams J, Hinton W, et al
A lack of a comparator group makes it hard to be sure whether computerised medical record system implementation achieved a better or worse outcome
BMJ Health & Care Informatics 2016;23:doi: 10.14236/jhi.v23i1.867

Publication history

  • First published January 1, 2016.
Online issue publication 
January 01, 2016

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Copyright information

© 2016 The Author(s). Published by BCS, The Chartered Institute for IT under Creative Commons license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/